I just updated my NFL Score Prediction game app. We are now entering Year #2 on the Google Play Store. You can download the application here (Android users, Google Play Store).
If you want to use the app, but do not have an Android phone, visit the direct URL: NFLScoreApp.com
The annual maintenance took me about 3-4 hours of work. This involved inputting the 2020 NFL schedule and resetting various internal knobs and levers. Not bad from a time standpoint... Although I will admit, I'm pretty lazy and I thought about just throwing my hands up and not renewing my server space about an hour in.
It was pretty nice out today, so I missed out on the great weather but instead was stuck inside staring at the computer screen, which is one reason I left the tech industry to begin with, but whatever.
The application costs $20 a year for the server space and it cost me a one-time fee of $25 to become a Google Developer, so from a money standpoint, it's not a huge waste of money. It amounts to a couple of magazine subscriptions, more or less.
This year (as opposed to 2019) I opened up the free app download to every single country that's available in the Google Play store. Last year I only had the application available to the U.S.A. and the United Kingdom.
Some improvements I made for the 2020 NFL Schedule: There is now a "My Stats" page that shows some bar graphs about your level of participation and gives your definitive ranking.
I redesigned the navigation to simplify it.
I limited the Leaderboard to the Top 25 users only.
I'm not sure how long I will continue to keep this app active, but I'm satisfied with how it's working as of now. I still believe in my concept, but I'd need major help to bring it to the next level.
If you are interested in working on or buying this application, i.e. purchasing the source code outright, shoot me an email. My address is listed on my "About Me" page on blogger. - Mike
Tuesday, May 26, 2020
Tuesday, May 5, 2020
Hooking up a mixer to a compressor or external preamp
I've been recording music for the past 3 years with a bizarre device, something I picked up online called the Peavey 10AT mixer. It's an audio mixer that has "AutoTune" built-in.
Going back to the early days of my audio engineering interest, back in 2001 when I picked up my first recording device, a Fostex-MR8 digital multi-tracker, I didn't know what I was doing. I jumped into the home recording hobby at a time when digital recording was very new. Analog was inaccessible, because I knew nothing about tape machines, or even DAT, so I was forced to figure out digital recording. Without any real mentor figure, I had to teach myself everything. It was almost 100% trial and error.
I can remember often hearing advice, going back to the early days of my interest in sound recording, which was always, "You need a mixer." But, I didn't understand. How could I hook up an analog mixer to record the sound into a digital file on my computer? It didn't make sense.
Remember, this was 2001, and so the concept of an affordable audio interface (or even a well known one) wasn't yet possible. Hence why I was directed towards the Fostex MR-8 machine, a consumer grade, "Digital multi-tracker" that essentially recorded audio files onto an SD card that was inserted into the device.
The Fostex MR-8 forced you to "Bounce" your mixes into a final version before you were able to transfer them via USB to your desktop computer. This mix-down process was shaky, and I remember the set of steps required was possible, but not automatic. You had to make sure the file sizes and the lengths of the audio were proper, otherwise you'd be unable to mix-down and you'd be left with files stuck on the physical machine, unable to proceed with the USB transferring. It was less-than-ideal, to say the least. Regardless, I was able to do this even back then, when I was only 13 years old.
I guess, for the sake of thoroughness, I can talk about three other devices I've personally spent time using to record, in between the Fostex MR-8 device (in 2001) and the Peavey 10AT (2017-Present).
In 2006 I bought and used a Presonus Firepod. This was a unit that allowed for 8 microphones to be connected simultaneously, and each of the audio tracks to be recorded individually into a DAW (Digital Audio Workstation). So, this bridged many gaps for me at the time. First off, having eight microphone inputs was desirable. As a neophyte drum recordist, I saw plenty of videos about how and why you needed separate microphones for every drum on the drum kit (Although now I favor just using a stereo pair). I used the Firepod actively until about the fall of 2013, so it lasted me 7 years. The device suffers from preamps that contain some sort of digital "sheen" artifact that's unpleasant, although I will mention, if you record in a good environment and with the leveling properly set, you'll notice this "sheen" disappears entirely. Still, the Firepod didn't offer the most sterile input signal processing. Which is why....
In 2014, I bought a Focusrite Saffire Pro 14. This device solved the issues of the Firepod, because the input signal it offers is very dry and sterile, almost completely transparent. I can't say much about this device, as I ultimately found it sort of lifeless and less-than-inspiring. I guess the most interesting part of my ownership of the device was the fact I had to risk my life to pick it up. I walked on foot to a very remote FedEx pickup location, and found myself in a bad part of town. At one point I was surrounded by a gang, who were riding ATVs around the streets, and this was in the inner-city, in a very remote part of New York City. I felt like I was in an episode of the Sopranos, when they take a guy to the remote part of Coney Island, for instance, and all of the sudden he realizes what's about to happen.
I did, however, attempt to liven up the Focusrite, with another piece of Focusrite gear, an ISA One analog Preamp. This was the first (and only) ever dedicated pre-amplifier I've owned and used. It's one piece of gear I somewhat regret letting go of, because it was pretty cool. I will mention, though, that it's only a one-channel device, so it's somewhat flawed in that sense. In order to hook up this preamp to the Focusrite Saffire Pro 14, I didn't have to try too hard, because I asked for help at the local Guitar Center (near Union Square in Manhattan) on what cables I'd need. The salesperson seemed to be knowledgeable, and let me know the exact cables I'd need. The ISA One included very easy-to-understand instructions as well, which helped me hook it up to the Saffire Pro 14 audio interface seamlessly. The ISA One performed well in that it livened up the input signal for the Focusrite Saffire Pro 14's AD conversion, and it also provided more clarity to the signal, which I mostly utilized on the vocal tracks on the music I was recording at the time. It was pretty good, but I wasn't that into it.
From Wikipedia: In electronics, an analog-to-digital converter (ADC, A/D, or A-to-D) is a system that converts an analog signal, such as a sound picked up by a microphone or light entering a digital camera, into a digital signal.
The other major device I used was a TEAC A-3340S. This was my first (and only) foray into fully analog recording. This device was interesting. I bought it off Craigslist and spent hours cleaning the heads with rubbing alcohol and cotton swabs, before running some brand new (at $65 a reel) tape through the machine. I was surprised to find out it actually worked, and seemed to be calibrated too. I used an analog mixer with this tape machine, namely a Yamaha MG series mixer.
So at one point, I was able to record to 1/4" tape with the TEAC A-3340S, and then playback the tape through the Saffire Pro 14's AD converter and into my computers DAW, for a fully analog to digital experience. This was back in 2015, more or less.
Eventually, I lost my job and looked around at the extensive amount of equipment I had acquired and decided I ought to part ways with most of it, and ultimately I sold all of my gear except for an acoustic guitar and a pair of cheap Shure PGA57 dynamic microphones, for the sake of minimalism and simplicity. That was years ago.
Obviously since then, I've been able to re-assess my recording interest and eventually found another job that paid well, and I was able to buy new and different recording equipment, and that's where I decided on the Peavey 10AT. And that's where everything came full circle.
The Peavey 10AT is not only a traditional analog mixer, it also allows you to stream the audio directly to your computer via USB (without any convoluted mix-down steps) with a built in AD converter. However, the 10AT has it's limitations, namely an inability to separate input signal feeds into separate tracks post AD conversion. Anyway, I was recently interested in adding some outboard gear to the Peavey 10AT and that's where I started to investigate how to hook up an external preamp or compressor to this mixer.
I've noticed the Peavey 10AT gives me a tonality that I've been able to work with, for sure, but how about the idea of using this Peavey 10AT as a traditional AD converter, much in the way I used my old Saffire Pro 14? How would I connect outboard gear to the mixer at the correct part of the signal path? That's where I checked out the above block diagram and considered the below schematic.
So if we inspect the schematic provided by Warm Audio, to show how to connect their WA12 MKII 500 preamplifier to an audio interface, we see it says, "Just plug it right into the front of your interface, into the first channel."
Well, upon closer inspection, it also says, "Buy our leveling amplifier and patch that between our preamp and your interface," but I'll disregard the inclusion of the leveling amp for now to avoid an in-depth discussion. But anyway, a leveling amplifier is a device that reduces the dynamic range of a signal, so the quieter parts become louder and the loudest parts become quieter. This effect creates a fuller or "richer" tonality to the signal, something I probably could've used with the Saffire Pro 14. But continuing on with the wiring discussion...
Inspecting the block diagram of the Peavey 10AT, you'll notice if I were to follow the above schematic and wired the Warm Audio output into the first channel input of my 10AT, I'd be running my microphone signal through TWO preamplifiers... the Warm Audio WA12 MKII 500 preamp AND the Peavey 10AT's built-in preamplifier , which obviously will muddy up the signal with excess gain. So, how to address this?
Looking at the Peavey 10AT block diagram, using channels 5 and 6 will allow us to bypass the Peavey 10AT's built-in preamplifier. This ought to work, however, we'll need to use the correct cables, and I believe these are referred to as "Stereo 1/4 inch" cables, or, rather, TRS cables, and also "Balanced 1/4 inch" cables. So you'll need this type of cable...
Just to double check, I read the Peavey 10AT official user's manual and found this:
"MIC/LINE INPUT (CH.1-8)
This combination input jack accepts a ¼” or XLR balanced plug. The XLR balanced input is optimized for a microphone or other low impedance source. The ¼” input is a TRS balanced type, and also accepts ordinary TS guitar cables."
Beyond 5/6's inputs, there are more channels on the Peavey 10AT mixer to consider: channels 9 and 10, and the AUX channel.
It seems like (again referencing the Peavey 10AT Block Diagram), channels 9/10 allow you to bypass the built-in EQ, but also disallow adding any built-in Digital FX to the signal, or applying AUX sends. So, it seems like using channels 9/10 isn't really designed exclusively for connecting outboard gear, but rather, running an external audio source into the mixer, like streaming audio from a radio, or an iPod, or something like that. Though, technically it can replicate the functionality of using channels 5 and 6, while also allowing you to explicity bypass the 10AT's built-in EQ. Channels 9/10 are basically just like Channels 5/6 minus a robust channel strip with Gain, L/R Panning, and Input Volume adjustment. With Channel 9/10 you're limited to a single master volume fader.
I guess, with the AUX channel, you are sending variable levels of each channel with an AUX dial to the AUX send outputs, which is useful for live mixing when your drummer asks for "More guitar" in his monitor. His monitor would be wired to the AUX send outputs, and the guitar's input, for instance, wired DI into Channel 4. By turning up the AUX dial on Channel 4, the drummer would hear his requested, "More guitar," in his monitor.
Of course, you can replace the drummer's monitor in the above example with, say, a piece of outboard gear, perhaps a rack-mounted EQ unit. Considering this idea, you are sending the guitar signal into the input of this rack-mounted EQ, instead of to a monitor.
By then connecting the output of that rack-mounted EQ back into a different input on the mixer, you are using the AUX function as an Effects Send/Return, or an Effects Loop. By turning the AUX dial on the guitar (Channel 4) up, you will send more of the guitar into the rack-mounted EQ, and subsequently back out of the rack-mounted EQ and into that separate channel on the mixer for playback.
So, bearing all this in mind, it seems Channels 5/6 are probably the way to go. So we've figured out how to hook up an external preamp to the Peavey 10AT, now what about a compressor as well? If we look at the back of this device below, FMR Audio's RNC 1773 compressor, we are given some clues on how this might work.
So this device has simple unbalanced 1/4" inputs and outputs. Now what?
If we follow the logic we found in the Peavey 10AT's block diagram, we notice on Channels 1/2, the 10AT's built-in preamplifier is first in the signal chain, and comes before the Peavey 10AT's built-in compressor. So, following that logic, with our outboard gear, we'd want to put the FMR RNC 1773 compressor AFTER the Warm Audio WA12 MKII 500 preamplifier in the signal chain.
Remember, we decided to connect the Warm Audio WA12 MKII 500 to channels 5/6 of the Peavey 10AT. So, the FMR Audio RNC 1773 will sit between the Warm Audio Preamp, and channels 5/6 of the Peavey 10AT. And... it seems as though, because the Warm Audio device offers us balanced XLR outputs, we're basically just patching the FMR compressor in with an additional male to male TRS cable. Pretty easy huh?
But wait, we're connecting cables between the balanced output of the Warm Audio preamp, and the unbalanced inputs/outputs of the FMR compressor to our balanced Peavey 10AT inputs. Now what? According to an article I found online, Mike Rivers, an audiologist tries to squash some rumors about balanced versus unbalanced connections, he tackles the issue head on:
The "Quick start" guide for the RNC delivers official information:
"The RNC can be hooked into Tip-Ring-Sleeve (TRS) insert points found on many consoles where: TIP = Console insert out, RING = Console insert in, SLEEVE = Ground reference. This means that each channel of the RNC can be hooked to a each channel of a TRS console insert with a single TRS cable."
Needless to say, I'd probably go with strictly (balanced) TRS connections between the Warm Audio preamp, the RNC compressor and the Peavey 10AT mixer. Boom!!
Lastly, the Warm Audio preamp discussed is only one-channel, whereas the FMR compressor offers two-channels. So, ideally you'd want a 2-channel preamp, or you could just buy two (2) of the Warm audio preamps, so you can record in stereo and apply uniform compression to your stereo signal. Shazam!!
That concludes this discussion and history of my own recording experiences and tutorial/explanation on how to potentially patch in outboard gear with your digital mixer or AD converter. Until next time. - Mike.
The Peavey 10AT mixer |
Going back to the early days of my audio engineering interest, back in 2001 when I picked up my first recording device, a Fostex-MR8 digital multi-tracker, I didn't know what I was doing. I jumped into the home recording hobby at a time when digital recording was very new. Analog was inaccessible, because I knew nothing about tape machines, or even DAT, so I was forced to figure out digital recording. Without any real mentor figure, I had to teach myself everything. It was almost 100% trial and error.
I can remember often hearing advice, going back to the early days of my interest in sound recording, which was always, "You need a mixer." But, I didn't understand. How could I hook up an analog mixer to record the sound into a digital file on my computer? It didn't make sense.
Remember, this was 2001, and so the concept of an affordable audio interface (or even a well known one) wasn't yet possible. Hence why I was directed towards the Fostex MR-8 machine, a consumer grade, "Digital multi-tracker" that essentially recorded audio files onto an SD card that was inserted into the device.
The Fostex MR-8 Digital multi-tracker |
The Fostex MR-8 forced you to "Bounce" your mixes into a final version before you were able to transfer them via USB to your desktop computer. This mix-down process was shaky, and I remember the set of steps required was possible, but not automatic. You had to make sure the file sizes and the lengths of the audio were proper, otherwise you'd be unable to mix-down and you'd be left with files stuck on the physical machine, unable to proceed with the USB transferring. It was less-than-ideal, to say the least. Regardless, I was able to do this even back then, when I was only 13 years old.
I guess, for the sake of thoroughness, I can talk about three other devices I've personally spent time using to record, in between the Fostex MR-8 device (in 2001) and the Peavey 10AT (2017-Present).
The Presonus Firepod |
In 2006 I bought and used a Presonus Firepod. This was a unit that allowed for 8 microphones to be connected simultaneously, and each of the audio tracks to be recorded individually into a DAW (Digital Audio Workstation). So, this bridged many gaps for me at the time. First off, having eight microphone inputs was desirable. As a neophyte drum recordist, I saw plenty of videos about how and why you needed separate microphones for every drum on the drum kit (Although now I favor just using a stereo pair). I used the Firepod actively until about the fall of 2013, so it lasted me 7 years. The device suffers from preamps that contain some sort of digital "sheen" artifact that's unpleasant, although I will mention, if you record in a good environment and with the leveling properly set, you'll notice this "sheen" disappears entirely. Still, the Firepod didn't offer the most sterile input signal processing. Which is why....
The Focusrite Saffire Pro 14 |
In 2014, I bought a Focusrite Saffire Pro 14. This device solved the issues of the Firepod, because the input signal it offers is very dry and sterile, almost completely transparent. I can't say much about this device, as I ultimately found it sort of lifeless and less-than-inspiring. I guess the most interesting part of my ownership of the device was the fact I had to risk my life to pick it up. I walked on foot to a very remote FedEx pickup location, and found myself in a bad part of town. At one point I was surrounded by a gang, who were riding ATVs around the streets, and this was in the inner-city, in a very remote part of New York City. I felt like I was in an episode of the Sopranos, when they take a guy to the remote part of Coney Island, for instance, and all of the sudden he realizes what's about to happen.
The Focusrite ISA One Preamp |
I did, however, attempt to liven up the Focusrite, with another piece of Focusrite gear, an ISA One analog Preamp. This was the first (and only) ever dedicated pre-amplifier I've owned and used. It's one piece of gear I somewhat regret letting go of, because it was pretty cool. I will mention, though, that it's only a one-channel device, so it's somewhat flawed in that sense. In order to hook up this preamp to the Focusrite Saffire Pro 14, I didn't have to try too hard, because I asked for help at the local Guitar Center (near Union Square in Manhattan) on what cables I'd need. The salesperson seemed to be knowledgeable, and let me know the exact cables I'd need. The ISA One included very easy-to-understand instructions as well, which helped me hook it up to the Saffire Pro 14 audio interface seamlessly. The ISA One performed well in that it livened up the input signal for the Focusrite Saffire Pro 14's AD conversion, and it also provided more clarity to the signal, which I mostly utilized on the vocal tracks on the music I was recording at the time. It was pretty good, but I wasn't that into it.
From Wikipedia: In electronics, an analog-to-digital converter (ADC, A/D, or A-to-D) is a system that converts an analog signal, such as a sound picked up by a microphone or light entering a digital camera, into a digital signal.
The Teac A-3340S (Pictured without reels) |
The other major device I used was a TEAC A-3340S. This was my first (and only) foray into fully analog recording. This device was interesting. I bought it off Craigslist and spent hours cleaning the heads with rubbing alcohol and cotton swabs, before running some brand new (at $65 a reel) tape through the machine. I was surprised to find out it actually worked, and seemed to be calibrated too. I used an analog mixer with this tape machine, namely a Yamaha MG series mixer.
Yamaha MG Series analog mixer |
So at one point, I was able to record to 1/4" tape with the TEAC A-3340S, and then playback the tape through the Saffire Pro 14's AD converter and into my computers DAW, for a fully analog to digital experience. This was back in 2015, more or less.
Eventually, I lost my job and looked around at the extensive amount of equipment I had acquired and decided I ought to part ways with most of it, and ultimately I sold all of my gear except for an acoustic guitar and a pair of cheap Shure PGA57 dynamic microphones, for the sake of minimalism and simplicity. That was years ago.
The Peavey 10AT mixer |
Obviously since then, I've been able to re-assess my recording interest and eventually found another job that paid well, and I was able to buy new and different recording equipment, and that's where I decided on the Peavey 10AT. And that's where everything came full circle.
The Peavey 10AT is not only a traditional analog mixer, it also allows you to stream the audio directly to your computer via USB (without any convoluted mix-down steps) with a built in AD converter. However, the 10AT has it's limitations, namely an inability to separate input signal feeds into separate tracks post AD conversion. Anyway, I was recently interested in adding some outboard gear to the Peavey 10AT and that's where I started to investigate how to hook up an external preamp or compressor to this mixer.
A block diagram of the signal flow for the Peavey 10AT |
I've noticed the Peavey 10AT gives me a tonality that I've been able to work with, for sure, but how about the idea of using this Peavey 10AT as a traditional AD converter, much in the way I used my old Saffire Pro 14? How would I connect outboard gear to the mixer at the correct part of the signal path? That's where I checked out the above block diagram and considered the below schematic.
Schematic on how to connect a Warm WA12 MKII 500 preamplifier to an audio interface. |
So if we inspect the schematic provided by Warm Audio, to show how to connect their WA12 MKII 500 preamplifier to an audio interface, we see it says, "Just plug it right into the front of your interface, into the first channel."
Well, upon closer inspection, it also says, "Buy our leveling amplifier and patch that between our preamp and your interface," but I'll disregard the inclusion of the leveling amp for now to avoid an in-depth discussion. But anyway, a leveling amplifier is a device that reduces the dynamic range of a signal, so the quieter parts become louder and the loudest parts become quieter. This effect creates a fuller or "richer" tonality to the signal, something I probably could've used with the Saffire Pro 14. But continuing on with the wiring discussion...
Inspecting the block diagram of the Peavey 10AT, you'll notice if I were to follow the above schematic and wired the Warm Audio output into the first channel input of my 10AT, I'd be running my microphone signal through TWO preamplifiers... the Warm Audio WA12 MKII 500 preamp AND the Peavey 10AT's built-in preamplifier , which obviously will muddy up the signal with excess gain. So, how to address this?
Looking at the Peavey 10AT block diagram, using channels 5 and 6 will allow us to bypass the Peavey 10AT's built-in preamplifier. This ought to work, however, we'll need to use the correct cables, and I believe these are referred to as "Stereo 1/4 inch" cables, or, rather, TRS cables, and also "Balanced 1/4 inch" cables. So you'll need this type of cable...
1/4" TRS male to XLR female cable |
Just to double check, I read the Peavey 10AT official user's manual and found this:
"MIC/LINE INPUT (CH.1-8)
This combination input jack accepts a ¼” or XLR balanced plug. The XLR balanced input is optimized for a microphone or other low impedance source. The ¼” input is a TRS balanced type, and also accepts ordinary TS guitar cables."
Beyond 5/6's inputs, there are more channels on the Peavey 10AT mixer to consider: channels 9 and 10, and the AUX channel.
It seems like (again referencing the Peavey 10AT Block Diagram), channels 9/10 allow you to bypass the built-in EQ, but also disallow adding any built-in Digital FX to the signal, or applying AUX sends. So, it seems like using channels 9/10 isn't really designed exclusively for connecting outboard gear, but rather, running an external audio source into the mixer, like streaming audio from a radio, or an iPod, or something like that. Though, technically it can replicate the functionality of using channels 5 and 6, while also allowing you to explicity bypass the 10AT's built-in EQ. Channels 9/10 are basically just like Channels 5/6 minus a robust channel strip with Gain, L/R Panning, and Input Volume adjustment. With Channel 9/10 you're limited to a single master volume fader.
I guess, with the AUX channel, you are sending variable levels of each channel with an AUX dial to the AUX send outputs, which is useful for live mixing when your drummer asks for "More guitar" in his monitor. His monitor would be wired to the AUX send outputs, and the guitar's input, for instance, wired DI into Channel 4. By turning up the AUX dial on Channel 4, the drummer would hear his requested, "More guitar," in his monitor.
Of course, you can replace the drummer's monitor in the above example with, say, a piece of outboard gear, perhaps a rack-mounted EQ unit. Considering this idea, you are sending the guitar signal into the input of this rack-mounted EQ, instead of to a monitor.
By then connecting the output of that rack-mounted EQ back into a different input on the mixer, you are using the AUX function as an Effects Send/Return, or an Effects Loop. By turning the AUX dial on the guitar (Channel 4) up, you will send more of the guitar into the rack-mounted EQ, and subsequently back out of the rack-mounted EQ and into that separate channel on the mixer for playback.
So, bearing all this in mind, it seems Channels 5/6 are probably the way to go. So we've figured out how to hook up an external preamp to the Peavey 10AT, now what about a compressor as well? If we look at the back of this device below, FMR Audio's RNC 1773 compressor, we are given some clues on how this might work.
FMR Audio's Really Nice Compressor 1773 model, with unbalanced inputs/outputs |
So this device has simple unbalanced 1/4" inputs and outputs. Now what?
If we follow the logic we found in the Peavey 10AT's block diagram, we notice on Channels 1/2, the 10AT's built-in preamplifier is first in the signal chain, and comes before the Peavey 10AT's built-in compressor. So, following that logic, with our outboard gear, we'd want to put the FMR RNC 1773 compressor AFTER the Warm Audio WA12 MKII 500 preamplifier in the signal chain.
Male to Male TRS (balanced) cable |
Remember, we decided to connect the Warm Audio WA12 MKII 500 to channels 5/6 of the Peavey 10AT. So, the FMR Audio RNC 1773 will sit between the Warm Audio Preamp, and channels 5/6 of the Peavey 10AT. And... it seems as though, because the Warm Audio device offers us balanced XLR outputs, we're basically just patching the FMR compressor in with an additional male to male TRS cable. Pretty easy huh?
But wait, we're connecting cables between the balanced output of the Warm Audio preamp, and the unbalanced inputs/outputs of the FMR compressor to our balanced Peavey 10AT inputs. Now what? According to an article I found online, Mike Rivers, an audiologist tries to squash some rumors about balanced versus unbalanced connections, he tackles the issue head on:
- "If you connect a balanced output to an unbalanced input you'll lose half the level. Sometimes, sometimes not. It depends on the output topology."
The "Quick start" guide for the RNC delivers official information:
"The RNC can be hooked into Tip-Ring-Sleeve (TRS) insert points found on many consoles where: TIP = Console insert out, RING = Console insert in, SLEEVE = Ground reference. This means that each channel of the RNC can be hooked to a each channel of a TRS console insert with a single TRS cable."
Needless to say, I'd probably go with strictly (balanced) TRS connections between the Warm Audio preamp, the RNC compressor and the Peavey 10AT mixer. Boom!!
Lastly, the Warm Audio preamp discussed is only one-channel, whereas the FMR compressor offers two-channels. So, ideally you'd want a 2-channel preamp, or you could just buy two (2) of the Warm audio preamps, so you can record in stereo and apply uniform compression to your stereo signal. Shazam!!
That concludes this discussion and history of my own recording experiences and tutorial/explanation on how to potentially patch in outboard gear with your digital mixer or AD converter. Until next time. - Mike.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Book review: Catcher In The Rye by J.D. Salinger
J.D. Salinger's The Catcher in The Rye is a war novel, much like Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five, hidden beneath a classic coming of ...
-
Admittedly I was pretty excited to go see Origami Angel last night. Two weeks ago I dialed my car's radio signal to WRPI Troy 91.5 on a...
-
I first heard about this movie when Richard Christy (Howard Stern) talked about it on the radio and how he had a "moment" with ano...
-
J.D. Salinger's The Catcher in The Rye is a war novel, much like Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five, hidden beneath a classic coming of ...