Showing posts with label Writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Writing. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 20, 2024

Book review: Catcher In The Rye by J.D. Salinger

J.D. Salinger's The Catcher in The Rye is a war novel, much like Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five, hidden beneath a classic coming of age story.

Most readers, myself included, initially consume the book as a teen and are able to relate to the protagonists sharp views on the world around him and feel the catharsis along with him as the novel climaxes then abruptly ends.

However, bearing in mind J.D. Salinger's WWII experience as an infantryman who carried and worked on pages of the novel with him in foxholes, and used his multilingual skills as a CIC Nazi spy interrogation specialist, who was supposedly involved with Project Artichoke, we can make further sense of the book.

The novel is an extended interrogation exercise-- via a cadenced, hypnotic conversation between the narrator, his psychoanalyst and the reader, and is filled with neuro-linguistic passages. A carefully crafted buildup of specific phrases and what appear as trigger words shock the system into momentary altered consciousness, as mentioned, at the climax of the book. Some readers have reported feeling weakened and melancholic for days following completion of the text.

This architectural underpinning is designed to force a confession out of the subject, who, due to the literary style, is both the narrator and reader-- Salinger draws you deeply into the thoughts of his narrator as if to merge your own inner voice with theirs. Several affirmations are also mixed into the text for stylistic effect, though this only aids in blurring the lines between literary art and outright CIA-level, military grade questioning.

Notice the books protagonist is staunchly negative for nearly the entire text in various ways. Then as he gets closer and closer to suicide or death, the author very suddenly introduces a third voice into the text and cranks the intensity knob to ten, all the while maintaining his hypnotic cadence, then, finally, everything flips... from negative to positive and we experience baptismal rains as they soak our narrator's symbolic hunters hat.

Then, suddenly, the book ends. And why shouldn't it? Salinger has gotten what he needs from us.

The hypnotic effects of the text are not to be understated, but moreso, the conclusion of the book forces the reader, much like the narrator, to self reflect. As it turns out, some readers are ill-equipped to face the music-- several famous assassins have cited the text as a catalytic ingredient to their madness. 

As teens we are able to understand the plot on the surface-- a prep school teen is forced to reckon with the fact he must grow up and leave his childhood in the past.

As an adult we more closely notice details like implied sex abuse and the harshness of the narrators confessions which include disturbing themes of societal alienation, suicidal ideation, religious blasphemy, alcoholism and an overall mental unwellness. The narrator's perceptiveness goes well beneath the surface, where the author has woven in dense subtext.

As a discerning reader we can draw the conclusion the text is coded with Salinger's military disillusionment over the course of his WWII experiences. With D.B. (Department of Defense) "out west" ... "writing movies," and "being a prostitute," the "phony" military brass "adults" (and the events of the war) have pushed Salinger's narrator, despite his unwavering faith in the purity of his dead brother, "Allie", to the brink of a mental breakdown which is described and confronted throughout the text, and ultimately accepted only through a loss of innocence, the narrator's melancholic carousel realization a christening of his rank as a member of the military. 

Of course, Salinger himself both escapes and shares the effects of his WWII experiences and subsequent PTSD--He checked into a hospital with "battle fatigue" after the surrender of Germany in 1945-- through his own will to live-- as reflected through self-belief in his own literary gifts. His decision to publish, sell millions, then drop out of society is the ultimate proof. He escaped the nightmares of war through writing.

Sunday, June 7, 2020

Ace Ventura: Pet Detective (Movie Review)

I just watched this classic for the first time since the movie's release, in 1994. I may have caught bits and pieces of the film on TV re-runs, but haven't seen the full movie from start to finish since at least 1996, or so.


Watching it back at age 32 gave me an opportunity to understand the movie more thoroughly. Before I dive into all of my opinions, a quick note. "Ace Ventura: Pet Detective," at just under 90 minutes, is the perfect length.

The plot of the movie back then was confusing for me, because I was 8 years old in 1996. I didn't understand the twists and turns of the story-line, and didn't understand all of the jokes.

What's actually hilarious is that when I was a little kid, in the climax of the movie, when Finkle is revealed to be Einhorn... I thought that Lois Einhorn had crapped her pants and there was a big load in her underwear, which is why it was funny.

As an adult, I realize it's actually because Finkle had just tucked his junk in between his legs and the "load" is actually his man parts. Heck, maybe I'll re-watch this film in my 60's and realize I was wrong back in my 30's as to why this scene is humorous. It's all up for debate.

My other takeaways from the film involve some of the less than kid-friendly humor that's thrown in, and how it's sort of like a rapid-fire collage of scenes. "Ace Ventura: Pet Detective" doesn't drag whatsoever. The relationship scenes between Courtney Cox and Jim Carrey are pretty enjoyable. I'd even venture to say the scene where they argue while in poolside lounge chairs is borderline endearing and dare I say, realistic.

Another scene that stuck out for me is when Ace breaks into a Los Angeles apartment complex. There are some shots interspersed that present a cool juxtaposition between a realistic look at life for some (either hard-working, or lazy) American one who likes to relax at his home and watch TV, and the cartoonish and very Hollywood character that is Ace Ventura, who scampers down the apartment complex walkways to eventually interact with this person.

I think the reason why this movie became so popular and such a phenomenon is because of the easy-to-understand, facial-expression-based humor from Ace. The over-the-top slapstick humor appeals to small children who relate to the type of interactions you see on Bugs Bunny, where every gesture is hyper-exaggerated.

The film also appeals to adults, with a somewhat complex detective/mystery subplot, and the macabre look into a disgraced football player who goes mental, and then changes his identity to become a woman in order to plot revenge on... a mega-famous archetype of Americana and pop culture, but also someone who is flawed himself in never having won "The Big Game," ... Mr. Dan Marino.

The writers certainly tossed every idea into the script except for the kitchen sink, and Jim Carrey pulls it all together with his performance.

"Ace Ventura: Pet Detective" combines gags, a light-hearted and easy-to-follow detective story-line and more complex and sort of "scary" elements. It accomplishes a lot in a short amount of time.

How I wrote/recorded my album "Disposable" (2025)

Click to listen on YouTube, out now!! This blog post will attempt to fully encapsulate as much of the writing/recording/mixing process of th...